HIST 102: U.S. History Since 1877 · Chapter 29, Lecture 1 · Richland Community College
Name:
How to Use This Study Guide
Find the lecture deck in your Canvas module. Click popup terms (dotted underlines) and press S for speaker notes. Review each section of the deck before filling in your answers here.
Write definitions and answers in your own words — do not copy directly from slides. Full sentences will serve you better on exams than fragments.
Can I use this on the exam? Yes — but only if handwritten. No printouts, no copy-paste from Google or AI.
Lyndon Johnson's Great Society (1964–1968) was the most ambitious expansion of federal domestic programs in American history — a deliberate attempt to use government power to eliminate poverty, reshape education, and guarantee health care. This lecture evaluates those programs not by their intentions but by their measurable long-run outcomes: poverty rates, family structure, bureaucratic growth, and the 1996 welfare reform that serves as the lecture's key natural experiment. The central argument is that the Great Society bypassed the mediating structures — families, churches, voluntary associations, and neighborhood networks — that had already produced dramatic pre-1964 progress, substituting federal bureaucracies whose incentive structures produced dependency rather than self-sufficiency.
Complete each statement using the lecture deck. Bold terms appear in Part II.
Review the deck and popup definitions, then write your own explanation in the space provided.
| Term | Your Definition |
|---|---|
| Mediating Structures Section I — What Actually Drove Pre-1964 Progress | After — deck + popups: family, church, neighborhood, voluntary association — institutions between individual and state |
| The Knowledge Problem (Hayek) Section I — The Knowledge Problem | After — deck + popups: central planners lack the dispersed, local, tacit knowledge to plan better than decentralized institutions |
| The Prosperity Paradox Section II — Why Act When Things Were Good? | After — deck + notes: five motivations explaining why a period of growth produced a massive government expansion |
| Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) Section II — What Was Built, Part 1 | After — deck + popups: administrative hub of the War on Poverty; coordinated all programs; run by Sargent Shriver |
| "Maximum Feasible Participation" Section II — What Was Built, Part 1 | After — deck + popups: mandate requiring the poor to participate in designing their own programs; produced conflict with local governments |
| AFDC — Man in the House Rules Section II — The Cash Transfer Programs | After — deck + popups: eligibility rules that disqualified families with an able-bodied male present — penalizing intact families |
| Bureaucratic Archipelago Section II — The Architecture: Not a Unified System | After — deck + notes: programs built on competing theories, operating with minimal coordination and independent political durability |
| Constituency-Building Section II — The Political Logic | After — deck + notes: programs structured to generate organized political support for their own survival — independent of outcomes |
| The Moynihan Report (1965) Section III — Moynihan's Warning | After — deck + notes: 1965 report predicting AFDC's incentive structure would damage Black family formation; suppressed rather than engaged |
| Epistemic vs. Institutional Critique Section IV — Two Critiques of the Same Failure | After — deck + notes: Hayek: planners lack knowledge; Berger & Neuhaus: planners bypassed institutions that actually work |
| Perverse Incentive Section II — The Cash Transfer Programs | After — deck + notes: a policy rule that produces the opposite of its intended result by rewarding the wrong behavior |
| Temporary Ladders vs. Permanent Floors Section III — The Bureaucratic Record | After — deck + notes: programs sold as transitional support became permanent entitlements — and the floor itself became the measure of success |
These questions appeared during the lecture. Write a full-paragraph response to each using evidence from the deck.
Section I — The Eisenhower Baseline
(Pause & Reflect)Black poverty fell from 87% to 47% between 1940 and 1960 — before the Civil Rights Act and before the Great Society. What forces drove that progress — and what does that trajectory imply about the role of government in lifting people out of poverty?
Section II — The Architecture of the Great Society
(Pause & Reflect)Johnson declared an "unconditional war on poverty" when unemployment was below 5% and the poverty rate had been falling for fifteen years. What are the political advantages of war rhetoric for a domestic policy agenda — and what are its long-term costs for honest evaluation of outcomes?
Section III — Outcomes vs. Promises
(Pause & Reflect)The man-in-the-house rules produced the same family structure damage in majority-white Appalachian communities as in Black urban ones. If the damage was the same across racial lines, what does that tell us about the real cause of the family structure collapse Moynihan documented in 1965?
Section IV — Why the Architecture Failed
(Pause & Reflect)The 1996 reform replaced unconditional cash entitlement with work requirements, time limits, and block grants. Caseloads fell 60%. Black child poverty dropped 11 points in six years. Why did outcomes respond so quickly? What does this tell us about the relative importance of incentive design versus broader economic or cultural forces?
Check each item when you can do it confidently without looking at your notes.